Daniel Craig said NO to $100,000,000 to star in two more Bond movies. Agree or disagree?

5

5 Answers

Ancient Hippy Profile
Ancient Hippy answered

Ahhhh, I say Live and Let Die, he's already got a Goldfinger but you can Never Say Never Again.

HappyTo BeHereTo Profile

He's getting older, and that makes him more prone to injury.  He got hurt on the last one. 

Frankly after seeing the permanent effects of strain injuries with my husband, I can't blame him.  He doesn't need the money.  We all need our health and to protect the quality of life in our elder years.  Mr. Happy is in constant pain.  I wouldn't wish that on anyone.

I say, let him choose what's best.  It's his life.

Matt Radiance Profile
Matt Radiance answered

1.It might be truth, it might not.

2.It's his choice, whether it be true or not , it's not gonna be odd at all.

3.Money is not everything, to so many people it is and to so many people it's not, not everyone make their final decision by money. Trust me i've seen it before a million times and i'm one of them personally.

Rooster Cogburn Profile
Rooster Cogburn , Rooster Cogburn, answered

He was a great James Bond but he's ready to pass the reins on to some one else. Last I read, it was these three men who are most likely to replace him. Daniel Craig is a fine actor and just wants to do other things. Money is not that important to him any more.

James Norton

Idris Elba

Damian Lewis


Walt O'Reagun Profile
Walt O'Reagun answered

He can do what he wants.

But if it were me ... If they were seriously offering $100 million ... If I were worried about injuries, I'd counter with less than that but they'd have to use CGI or stunt people for anything I didn't want to do.  LOL

Answer Question

Anonymous