In its details about dates, places and times, Gone With the Wind (I mean the Margaret Mitchell novel) is remarkably accurate. Anything regarding the dates of battles, legislation passed, and even small things like fashions in women's clothing etc, historians tend to be extremely impressed by Mitchell's scholarship.
Of course her analysis of the American Civil War and its aftermath is another matter. However exciting the book may be, and however convincing its style, even its fans can't deny that it shows extreme prejudice. This is mainly towards the Northeners or "Yankees" who are mostly depicted as marauding brutes, looting and pillaging in a manner quite unknown to the "gentlemanly" Southerners. Even more noticeable is her extraordinary depiction - in defiance of most historical records - of plantation slavery as an essentially benevolent institution, with simple-minded slaves depending on their kind owners and, in some cases, rejecting freedom. Mitchell has been rightly criticised for this; I have heard that her real-life views were rather more complex, but couldn't tell you much about that.
Of course her analysis of the American Civil War and its aftermath is another matter. However exciting the book may be, and however convincing its style, even its fans can't deny that it shows extreme prejudice. This is mainly towards the Northeners or "Yankees" who are mostly depicted as marauding brutes, looting and pillaging in a manner quite unknown to the "gentlemanly" Southerners. Even more noticeable is her extraordinary depiction - in defiance of most historical records - of plantation slavery as an essentially benevolent institution, with simple-minded slaves depending on their kind owners and, in some cases, rejecting freedom. Mitchell has been rightly criticised for this; I have heard that her real-life views were rather more complex, but couldn't tell you much about that.